Proficiency Test Corrective Action Checklist |
|
07Department _____________________________ Evaluation Date ___________________Proficiency Survey_________________________ Test & Specimen number_________________Reported Results____________ Expected Results____________ Acceptable Range___________ | Investigation of Unacceptable Results | Yes | No | N/A | | Was the assay repeated? | | | | | Was the repeated result within the acceptable range? | | | | | Was QC acceptable on day of test? | | | | | Was QC free of drifts or trends? | | | | | Have errors occurred with this analyte in the last 2 surveys? | | | | | Were the survey specimens acceptable when received? | | | | | Were the specimens handled properly before & during testing? | | | | | Did a time delay occur between reconstitution & analysis? | | | | | Were the specimens mixed-up? | | | | | Was a pipetting or dilution error made? | | | | | Did any instrument or reagent problems occur on the day of testing? | | | | | Had assay calibration been performed as required? | | | | | Had instrument maintenance been performed as required? | | | | | Were instrument parameters entered correctly? | | | | | Were the results within the linear range? | | | | | Was the correct instrument code entered in the survey? | | | | | Was a transcription error made? | | | | | Was a transposition error made? | | | | | Was a calculation error made? | | | | | Were results misinterpreted or misidentified? | | | |
| Investigation of bias, trends or miscellaneous findings | | Conclusion: Corrective Action Taken: Investigated by:_________________________________________ Date____________
Manager:______________________________________________ Date____________
Pathologist ____________________________________________ Date____________ |
| Last Updated on Thursday, 07 April 2011 |