ClinLabNavigator Logo
Analyzing Samples
Available Test Interpretations
Ham
Haptoglobin
Health Screening
Helicobacter Pylori
Hematocrit
Hemochromatosis Genotype
Hemochromatosis Genotypes and Risk of Ischemic Stroke
Hemoglobin
Hemoglobin A1c
Hemoglobin A2
Hemoglobin Electrophoresis
Hemoglobin Fetal
Heparin
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia
Heparin Low Molecular Weight
Hepatitis A Antibody IgG & IgM
Hepatitis A Virus IgM
Hepatitis B Serology
Hepatitis B Surface Antibody
Hepatitis B Viral Load
Hepatitis C Genotyping
Hepatitis C Quantitative PCR
Hepatitis C Test Recommendations
Hepatitis C Virus Antibody
Hepatitis C Virus RIBA
Hepatitis C Virus RNA by PCR
Hepatitis Test Recommendations
Herbs & Lab Tests
Herpes Simplex Type Specific Serology
Herpes Simplex Virus
Herpes Simplex Virus IgG & IgM
High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol
Histone Antibody
HLA B27
Homocysteine
Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Pregnancy Test
Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Tumor Marker
Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 p24 Antigen
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Antibody EIA
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Viral Load
Human Immunodeficiency Virus Western Blot
Human Papillomavirus DNA Hybrid Capture
Human T Cell Lymphotropic Virus 1 & 2 Antibody
Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid
Hydroxylase Antibodies
Hypercoagulable Panel
Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis Serology
Hypoglycemia
Test Interpretations
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Hepatitis C Test Recommendations

Print This Page
E-mail This Page

Much knowledge about the natural history of hepatitis C (HCV) infection has been gained in the last several years and treatment strategies have improved. Likewise, laboratory testing for HCV has evolved. Initially, only serologic assays were available. Screening for HCV antibody by EIA was followed by a confirmatory immunoblot, the RIBA. If both assays were positive, infection was established.



Within the past 10 years, molecular assays that directly detect viral particles have been developed. Molecular assays utilizing PCR technology can be qualitative or quantitative. Qualitative assays are more sensitive and reproducible than quantitative assays. In addition, PCR and DNA sequencing technology can now be used to establish the HCV genotype. Currently available assays and their major features are listed in the following table.

Assay

Optimal Use

HCV Antibody EIA

Initial screening test for chronic infection

HCV Immunoblot

Confirm positive antibody if PCR qualitative test negative

HCV PCR Qualitative

Most sensitive PCR assay

Detect viremia

Assess response to therapy

Detect acute infection

HCV PCR Quantitative

Establish viral load prior to therapy

HCV Genotype

Guide therapeutic decisions





The advent of molecular assays has led to a variety of algorithms for diagnosing HCV infection and assessing therapeutic response. A recent review (NEJM 2001;345:41-52) summarized current thinking about optimal use of serologic and molecular tests. The most cost-effective algorithm is based on the following principles:
  • HCV infection is most often detected by HEP C ABY EIA. Positive results should be confirmed by HCV PCR QL, which detects 50 IU/mL of virus, rather than HCV PCR QT, which detects 600 IU/mL. Persons who are EIA and PCR positive are infected and viremic.
  • HCV RIBA should be used to confirm HEP C ABY EIA positive results if HCV PCR QL is negative. Persons who are EIA and RIBA positive but PCR negative are infected but not viremic.
  • HEP C ABY EIA results may be negative in HCV infected individuals who are immuno-compromised or in the acute phase of infection. HCV PCR QL will detect viremia in these individuals.
  • HCV PCR QT and HCV GENO should be performed prior to therapy to determine viral load and genotype, which guide therapeutic decisions. Currently, the only relevant genotype distinction is between genotype 1 and genotypes 2 and 3.
  • HCV PCR QL should be used at 24 weeks, 48 weeks, and 6 months after treatment to assess response.