Platelets for transfusion can be prepared either by separation of platelet concentrates from whole blood or by apheresis from single donors. Comparative studies have shown that post-transfusion increment, platelet survival and hemostatic effect are similar with either product.
Random Donor Platelets
Platelets prepared from whole blood are often referred to as random donor platelet concentrates. Platelet rich plasma is separated from red blood cells by centrifugation at a low G force within 4 hours after donation. Platelet rich plasma is then centrifuged at higher G force and most of the platelet poor plasma supernatant is removed. The remaining platelet concentrate contains between 5.5 and 8.5 X 1010 platelets suspended in about 50 mL of plasma. This is approximately 70% of the platelets in the original unit of whole blood.
Platelets are stored at room temperature using continuous gentle horizontal agitation in plastic bags designed to optimize oxygen and carbon dioxide exchange. Platelets can be preserved for 7 days under these conditions, but their shelf life is limited to 5 days because of potential problems with bacterial contamination. Platelet concentrates are pooled immediately prior to transfusion and can then be stored for 4 hours.
One drawback of random donor platelets is that the concentrates contain 108 to 109 white blood cells or approximately 50% of the leukocytes from the original unit of whole blood. Random donor platelets should be transfused through a bedside leukocyte reduction filter.
Random donor platelet concentrates may contain up to 0.5 mL of red cells. Different studies have demonstrated that 8 to 19% of Rh negative cancer patients form anti-D antibody if transfused with Rh positive platelet concentrates. Rh negative units should be used for Rh negative female children and women of childbearing age. If this is not possible then one vial of Rh immune globulin may be given before or immediately after transfusion with Rh positive platelets. Because these patients are thrombocytopenic, it is preferable to administer anti-D intravenously. WinRho SDF is the only licensed IV preparation available in the United States. A dose of 25 ug (125 IU) will protect against 1 mL of RBCs.
Single Donor Platelets
Apheresis platelets are usually called single donor platelets because they are collected from a single donor with an automated cell separator. Donors usually have an IV line in each arm. Blood pumped from one arm passes through a blood cell separator centrifugation system that collects platelets and returns plasma and red cells to the donor's other arm. Between 4000 and 5000 mL of blood are processed over 1.5 to 2 hours. A single donor platelet concentrate contains a minimum of 3.0 X 1011 platelets suspended in approximately 200 mL of plasma, which is the equivalent of 6 to 8 random donor platelet concentrates. They can be stored up to 5 days under the same conditions as random donor platelet concentrates. Five day old apheresis platelets produce the same posttransfusion platelet increment as one day old units.
Single donor apheresis platelets contain fewer than 5 x 106 white blood cells and are considered to be leukocyte reduced. Additional leukocyte reduction filtration is not necessary. Rh negative patients do not need Rh immune globulin after transfusion of Rh positive apheresis platelets because they contain so few red blood cells.
Single donor platelets offer several advantages over random donor concentrates including:
- Less inventory and pooling
- Fewer donor exposures & fewer lookback investigations
- Leukocyte reduction during collection eliminates the need for bedside filtration
- Ten fold lower risk of bacterial contamination & 5 fold lower risk of septic transfusion reaction
- Easier platelet crossmatching or HLA matching for refractory patients
- Fewer contaminating red blood cells eliminating need for RhIg
Because of these advantages, Saint Luke's Hospital uses apheresis platelets whenever possible. Random donor platelets are used only if there is a shortage of single donor platelets or a patient has become refractory and a crossmatch compatible apheresis unit is not available. Apheresis platelets have a higher processing fee than random donor platelets, but the cost difference is negligible when pooling and leukocyte reduction filter costs are considered.
Platelet ABO Compatibility
The term "ABO-compatible" is confusing when thinking about blood components other than RBCs. Red Blood Cell units contain cells carrying the ABO antigens of the donor and plasma carrying soluble ABO antigens and anti-A and anti-B antibodies. The recipient also possesses ABO antigens and antibodies, but in much larger amounts. Group O blood components do not express cellular and soluble A and B antigens, but do contain anti-A and anti-B antibodies, often in higher titer and avidity than in group A or B components. Group O (so-called universal donor) RBCs usually can be safely transfused to group A or B patients, because the volume of residual incompatible plasma (30 - 70 mL) is minimal. In contrast, a single donor (apheresis) platelet or a pool of 10 random donor platelet concentrates is suspended in 200 to 600 mL of donor plasma. If these platelets are not ABO identical, large volumes of incompatible plasma will be infused, often on a daily basis for extended periods. Anti-A and anti-B can bind to RBCs and to soluble A and B antigens. In the latter instance, immune complexes are formed that can initiate inflammation, tissue injury, and immune suppression. Thus, unlike RBC transfusions, there really are no ABO compatible platelet transfusions. Platelet transfusions should be classified as either ABO identical or nonidentical.
The most obvious adverse effect of transfusing ABO nonidentical platelets is hemolysis. The risk of an ABO hemolytic reaction is rare after a single transfusion of ABO nonidentical platelets, but increases significantly when large volumes are transfused over a relatively short time period. Hemolysis is unlikely after a single ABO incompatible unit for two reasons. First, transfused plasma (500 mL) is diluted almost 10 fold in the patient's intravascular blood volume (5000 mL). Second, and perhaps most importantly, transfused anti-A and anti-B antibodies are rapidly neutralized by binding to circulating soluble A and B antigens as well as tissue A and B antigens. Transfusion of platelets containing large volumes of ABO incompatible plasma saturates soluble and tissue ABO antigen sites and permits binding of excess anti-A and/or anti-B to red blood cells. When this happens, patients develop a positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) and possibly hemolysis.
Other serious adverse consequences of transfusing ABO nonidentical platelets have also been reported. Chronically transfused patients with hematologic disease who are transfused with nonidentical ABO platelets have lower post-transfusion platelet counts, require almost twice as many platelet transfusions, and develop platelet refractoriness earlier than patients receiving ABO identical platelet transfusions. Transfusion of group A or B platelets to group O recipients results in post-transfusion platelet increments that are 20% less than those obtained with ABO identical platelet transfusions. Decreased platelet survival is due to the binding of recipient anti-A and/or anti-B to the transfused donor platelets. Transfusion of group O platelets to group A or B recipients results in even lower post-transfusion platelet increments, suggesting that incompatible plasma is an even more important risk factor. In this situation, anti-A and anti-B in the transfused plasma forms immune complexes with soluble A and/or B antigens circulating in the recipient's plasma. These complexes circulate for hours to days after incompatible transfusions and can bind to platelets resulting in their activation and premature destruction.
Transfusion of ABO nonidentical platelets to transplant patients can have even more deleterious effects. Patients receiving allogeneic marrow or stem cell transplants and patients receiving chemotherapy for acute leukemia have increased mortality due to multi-organ failure and sepsis if they are transfused with ABO nonidentical platelets. ABO antigens, like HLA antigens, are widely expressed on the endothelium lining of blood vessels. Anti-A and/or anti-B antibodies present in ABO incompatible platelets appear to inflict direct damage to organs by binding to endothelial A and B antigens. The formation of anti-A and/or anti-B immune complexes also suppresses cellular immunity, resulting in a predisposition to infection.
To provide optimal patient care SLH Blood Bank issues ABO identical apheresis platelets whenever possible. Apheresis platelets are preferred over random donor platelets, because of the lower risks associated with a decreased number of donor exposures. If ABO identical apheresis platelets are not available, it is most important to avoid transfusing substantial amounts of anti-A and/or anti-B to patients expressing those antigens. Therefore, the second best choice is to provide random donor ABO identical platelets with a bedside leukocyte reduction filter. When neither apheresis nor random donor ABO identical platelets are available, the ordering physician should be consulted to see if the transfusion could be delayed until ABO identical platelets become available. If immediate transfusion is necessary, the following Table should be consulted for additional choices.
Platelet Transfusions for All Patients except ABO Mismatched Allogeneic Blood & Marrow Transplant Recipients
Recipient ABO Group |
Platelet Choices |
O |
O apheresis
O random donor |
A |
A apheresis
A random donor
O apheresis
O random donor |
B |
B apheresis
B random donor
O apheresis
O random donor |
AB |
AB apheresis
AB random donor
A apheresis
A random donor
B apheresis
B random donor
O apheresis
O random donor |
The Transfusion Service should also refrain from infusing substantial amounts of soluble or cell associated A and/or B antigens to patients with detectable levels of the corresponding antibody. The most common example is the transfusion of Group A or B platelets to a group O recipient. This practice is permissible if a patient is hemorrhaging and has a platelet count below 100,000 and neither group O random nor single donor platelets are available.
Summary
- 1st choice is ABO identical apheresis platelet
- 2nd choice is ABO identical random donor platelets with bedside leukocyte reduction filter
- 3rd choice is to see if transfusion can be delayed until ABO identical platelets become available
- 4th choice is ABO nonidentical apheresis platelet (see table above)
- 5th choice is ABO nonidentical random donor platelets with bedside leukocyte filter (see table above)
Platelet Dosage
The dose of platelets should be individualized. A number of simple rules can be used to calculate the appropriate dose.
- A dose of 1 random donor platelet concentrate per 10 kg body weight can be expected to increase the platelet count by 5000/uL in a non-refractory patient.
- One random donor platelet concentrate is expected to increase the platelet count by 5000 to 10,000/uL in a 70 kg patient who is not refractory.
- Generally, a pool of 6 to 8 platelet concentrates or a single apheresis unit is sufficient to correct or prevent bleeding in a normal sized adult weighing up to 90 kg.
- One apheresis product is equivalent to 6 to 8 random donor platelet concentrates and therefore should increase the platelet count by 30,000/uL to 40,000/uL in a 70 kg patient.
- For pediatric patients, 5 mL/kg body weight of a random donor platelet concentrate should increase the platelet count by 5000/uL. A single platelet concentrate contains about 45 to 50 mL and should supply the needs of patients up to 8 kg. If the entire platelet concentrate is not used for a given patient, it is not practical to salvage the remainder of the unit.
- For children >8 kg, a standard dose of 1 unit/10 kg should be used.
- In the absence of increased platelet destruction, platelet transfusion will usually need to be repeated every 3-5 days.
- If increased platelet destruction or consumption is present, daily administration may be required.
Platelet Transfusion Guidelines
The most common reasons for transfusing platelets are:
- Decreased platelet production
- Increased destruction
- Qualitative platelet defects
Platelet transfusion is generally reserved for patients with impaired marrow production of platelets and should be avoided whenever possible for patients with increased platelet destruction such as autoimmune or drug induced thrombocytopenia. Platelet transfusions are relatively contraindicated in patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura because of concerns about the risk of precipitating thrombosis.
A. Decreased platelet production
- Prophylaxis against spontaneous hemorrhage when:
- Platelet counts are < 10,000/uL.
- Platelet counts are < 20,000/uL with fever, infection or similar condition.
- Platelet counts are < 50,000/uL with headache, continued bleeding from a wound or surgical incision, retinal hemorrhage or confluent petechial hemorrhage.
- Platelet count < 50,000/uL with microvascular bleeding, epistaxis, hematuria, or suspected or proven internal bleeding.
- Platelet count < 50,000/uL and prophylaxis prior to surgery or invasive procedures. Includes central venous catheter insertion, dental extractions, transbronchial biopsy, bronchoscopy, bronchoalveolar lavage, GI endoscopy, liver biopsy and lumbar puncture.
B. Increased platelet destruction or consumption
- Intraoperative use:
- Platelet count < 50,000/uL and nonmechanical or microvascular bleeding
- Platelet count < 100,00/uL and neurosurgery, middle ear surgery, or ophthhalmologic surgery
- Platelet count < 100,000/uL and ventricular assist devices, cardiopulmonary bypass, or intra-aortic balloon pump
- Platelet count < 50,000/uL during massive transfusion & continued non-mechanical bleeding
- Platelet count < 50,000/uL & hypersplenism, sepsis, or DIC
- ITP if severe hemorrhage
- TTP and hemolytic uremic syndrome if platelet count < 10,000/uL or hemorrhage
- Neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia - washed maternal or antigen negative platelets
C. Qualitative platelet defects:
- Congenital defect only if bleeding. Consider desmopressin (DDAVP)
- Acquired defect if hemorrhage. Platelets are of limited benefit and should be reserved for severe hemorrhage. Consider DDAVP, cryoprecipitate, or dialysis for uremia
- Platelet antagonist reversal if bleeding or emergency surgery
- Aspirin
- Plavix (clopidogrel)
- Reopro (abciximab)
- Integrilin (eptifibatide)
- Aggrastat (tirofiban)
- Angiomax (bivalirudin)
D. Pediatric indications:
Premature infants < 37 weeks gestation
- Platelet count < 50,000/uL in a stable infant
- Platelet count < 100,000/uL in a sick infant
Qualitative platelet defects can be either acquired or congenital. Uremia, aspirin and other platelet antagonists most commonly cause acquired platelet defects. Platelet transfusions are of limited value in the treatment of acquired disorders, since transfused platelets are also inactivated. They should be limited to treatment of severe bleeding. DDAVP or cryoprecipitate should be tried first.
Cryoprecipitate transiently corrects uremic platelet defects. Reversal of a qualitative platelet defect requires 10 units of cryoprecipitate. Improvement in platelet function may not be evident for up to 4 hours and lasts approximately 24 hours. Repeat doses of cryoprecipitate are less beneficial. Dialysis also corrects the uremic qualitative platelet defect. Thus, the use of cryoprecipitate to correct a qualitative platelet defect should be reserved for life-threatening hemorrhage or prior to an invasive procedure.
Alternatively, desmopressin (DDAVP) or dialysis can be used to correct the uremic platelet defect. DDAVP can be used for both acquired and congenital platelet defects. The recommended dose is 0.3 mg/Kg given intravenously over a period of 15 to 30 minutes. If used preoperatively, the dose should be given 30 minutes prior to the scheduled procedure. Repeat use may result in tachyphylaxis, which can be overcome by waiting 24 to 48 hours before the second dose.
Monitoring The Effectiveness Of Platelet Transfusions
- A pre-transfusion platelet count should be obtained within 24 hours of ordering a platelet transfusion.
- A post-transfusion platelet count should be done the morning following a platelet transfusion to document the platelet count increment.
- If two consecutive transfusions yield increments that do not meet the minimum standard for a successful transfusion (see Refractoriness below), the effectiveness of subsequent platelet transfusions should be evaluated by performing a count 10 to 60 minutes after their completion.
- When HLA-matched or cross matched platelets are provided for refractory patients (see below), a platelet count within one hour prior to transfusion and 10-60 minutes following completion of transfusion is necessary to evaluate their effectiveness.
Most nonimmune causes of platelet destruction have a greater effect on the 24 hour post-transfusion platelet count than the 10-60 minutes count. Patients with severe infection or DIC can have a relatively normal immediate post-transfusion platelet count, but a low 24 hour platelet count. Massive splenomegaly, shock and massive transfusion are exceptions to this observation. In contrast, patients with platelet antibody have both markedly shortened 10-60 minute and 24 hour post-transfusion platelet counts. Thus, it is usually possible to distinguish alloimmunization (refractoriness) from other complicating medical factors by measurement of platelet counts immediately after transfusion.
Most platelet transfusions are given prophylactically. This means that platelets are transfused to a patient who has thrombocytopenia, but is not bleeding. In stable patients without other factors that increase the risk of bleeding, the goal is to continuously maintain the platelet count above 10 to 20,000/uL. The immediate posttransfusion platelet count should be >20,000/uL and the platelet count obtained 24 hours later should still be >10,000/uL.
In more unstable patients with other risk factors for bleeding (e.g. medications, liver disease, renal failure, prolonged PT &/or PTT, sepsis, DIC), it is more desirable for the immediate posttransfusion platelet count to be >30,000/uL and the 24 hour platelet count to be >20,000/uL.
Overt bleeding will be controlled in nearly all thrombocytopenic patients if the posttransfusion platelet count is 40,000/uL or higher. In contrast, bleeding diminishes in only about one third of patients when the posttransfusion platelet count remains < 20,000/uL. If the posttransfusion platelet count is not sustained, bleeding will resume when the platelet count falls below 10,000/uL. Therefore, the platelet count needs to be maintained above 10,000 to 20,000/uL for at least 24 hours.
Refractoriness
Alloimmunization against histocompatibility antigens occurs in 25 to 35% of patients with acute leukemia who are transfused with multiple random donor platelet transfusions and in 4 to 5% transfused with apheresis platelets. This is the most important long-term complication of platelet transfusions because patients become refractory to future platelet transfusions.
- An adult patient is considered to be refractory if the 10-60 minute post-transfusion platelet count fails to rise more than 2000/uL per random platelet concentrate or 10,000 to 12,000/uL per apheresis platelet.
- Children are considered to be refractory if the one hour post-tranfusion platelet count fails to rise more than 3500/uL per random donor platelet concentrate.
- Because patients may have a poor post-transfusion increment to a single transfusion yet have excellent platelet increments with subsequent transfusions, a diagnosis of refractoriness should only be made when at least two ABO compatible transfusions, stored less than 72 hours, result in poor increments.
Other causes of platelet destruction should also be ruled out including:
- Fever
- Sepsis
- Splenomegaly
- DIC
- Bleeding
- Status post-BMT
- Alloimmunzation
- Drug induced immune thrombocytopenia
The diagnosis of refractoriness should be confirmed by testing for platelet antibody, which detects antibody to HLA and platelet-specific antigens. Approximately 90% of alloimmunized patients will have demonstrable platelet antibody.
If the platelet antibody test is positive, a refractory patient is best managed by transfusion of crossmatch compatible apheresis platelets. There is no evidence that alloimmunized patients benefit from continued prophylactic transfusion of incompatible platelets that do not produce an increase in posttransfusion platelet count.
If there is an inadequate post transfusion platelet count increment following 4 consecutive crossmatch compatible single donor platelets, it is reasonable to revert to the use of randomly selected products. It is important to obtain platelet counts 10 minutes to 1 hour following each transfusion of compatible platelets since a useful but temporary post transfusion increment may occur but be missed if platelet counts are not obtained until the next morning.
Bleeding patients, for whom compatible platelet donors cannot be found in a timely manner, may benefit from repeated transfusions of pooled random donor platelets (10 or more concentrates per pool). Large numbers of random platelets may adsorb much of the platelet antibody and fortuitously include some compatible units. Intravenous immune globulin and plasma exchanges are not effective in reducing the refractory state.
If the platelet antibody screening test is negative, refractoriness is probably due to clinical factors rather than alloimmunization and crossmatched platelets will not be beneficial .
|